Beware of what you ask for, it may come true, a saying goes. All of you who felt a 3-hour test was too long and wanted a shorter test have now got what you want but going from the stories about the way test-takers have felt and performed in the latest SimCAT in the new format, most seem to be ruing the change.
Whenever there are major changes happening all around you, what is paramount as that you who are the centre of these changes be still. More importantly you need to be very clear about the things you can know, the things you can never know, and the things there is no point in knowing. Most importantly, you need to be able to calm, strategic (or tactical), and ruthless, to navigate the changes.
The reason behind the changes
It is more than obvious that the reason behind the changes is not any sort of dissatisfaction with the pattern that has remained unchanged more or less the last 5 years but or the need to test newer or different skill sets.
Long before even the notification was out, I thought that they would go back to holding the test over two days with four slots or even a week to account for social distancing requirements but when the convener announced that it will held in one day as it has been over the past few years, it did come as a surprise. I remember thinking to myself that they are either winging it or we are in for a surprise.
Their way of managing has been to increase the number cities to six and the slots to three and it was the latter that caused the reduction in the duration of the test. The CAT has never been a test-taker friendly exam — so those who will end up with an 8:30 slot in the 6th city of their choice (a city they probably have never been to, not to mention travelling in the midst of the pandemic) have no other option but to do as well as those who get their preferred slot in a centre in their hometown — it is a lottery and citizens of a poor, developing country that we are, we are used to accepting our fate, grinning & bearing it, and fighting. I do not think anyone ever paused to think what will be good for the test-takers — take it or leave it seems to be the message.
And yeah, I would not be surprised if they revert to the old format next year.
The impact of the changes — fewer questions
It does without saying that the number of questions will come down proportionately — the Math says it has be 66 or 67. Beyond this everything else is speculation since we do not have any idea of figuring out what is going on in their head.
If I have to take a bet in terms of number of questions, I will take a bet on the higher side since they do not lose anything by giving more questions, it is not a test of completion anyway. If they have been giving 8 sets in 60 minutes of DI-LR for the past so many years, then I do not think 24-26 questions per section and 75 questions in total with 4 marks each is perfectly feasible.
My highest bet would be on 26-24-25 — VA-RC: RC — 16, 4 Passages, 10 VA; DI-LR: 6 Sets, 4 questions each; QA: 25 questions
My logic for the same is CAT unlike the GMAT, which seeks to differentiate in the middle, since it is a benchmarking test, seeks to differentiate at the top since it is an elimination test — they do not want scores bunching up at the top — having more questions will differentiate the 99 from the 99.5 and 99.5 from the 99.95.
We can indulge in endless speculation over all the options that the test-setters have in mind but they would remain just that — speculation. I would rather follow good ol’ Kipling’s dictum — If you can keep your head when all about you are losing their
Also since the change is primarily a logistical one they will try to go about things without changing much else, or to put it differently I do not see a necessity to change anything else — question types or areas tested — so I won’t be worried about Grammar and freak out about it (I will be worried about something if most of the others are good at it barring me, I don’t think 200000 Indians , including the top 1 percentilers, are going to develop expertise in Grammar and become champs at it in the next few weeks, no way) but if freaking out is your forte, go ahead and howl out to the skies.
The impact of the changes — Are you ready for a sprint?
The biggest impact of the change is in the way we have to perceive the duration we have for a section.
When we have 60-minutes for a section, I think most people will experience it and perform into the four parts (the parts in the brackets indicate what happens to those who do not well):
- Slot 1: 0-15 Minutes: Settle down and get a hang of the paper, solve a few sitters (do not even know how 15 minutes flew by)
- Slot 2: 15-30: Consolidate and get going (start to get hang of things)
- Slot 3: 30-45: Consolidate, go past the cut-off (have the cut-off in sight)
- Slot 4: 45-60: Mop up the left overs, maximise (panic, panic, panic)
I have stated the extremes and I am sure many of people will fall somewhere in the middle.
In the 60-minute format as you see there is enough and more room for you to
- settle in get comfortable
- inefficiently go back and forth between sets
- waste time scratching around RC passages, DI-LR sets, Type Bs in QA, realising they should be left alone and moving on
In 60-minute format the difference between the 80-percentiler on DI-LR who solves 2 sets and the 99.95 percentiler who solves 6 sets is not that the 80-percentiler needs 30 minutes to solve a set but that the 80-percentiler wastes a lot of time unproductively across sets before finally getting hold of two sets.
Basically you can be inefficient, you can choose a wrong set, and still manage to clear the cut-off since everyone else is in the same boat.
In the 40-minute format you do not have the luxury of the first 15 and the last 15 minutes. It is a sprint from start to finish you have to bat for the entire 40 minutes the way Kohli and Dhoni bat and run as a pair (or used to rather), pushing hard each and every time — no time for dot balls at the beginning, no scope for crazy slogging at the end.
More importantly you have no room for error as far choosing sets and questions is concerned — one wrong passage or set, and be ready to welcome CAT 2021.
So set and passage selection is of utmost importance. Investing 5-minutes and selecting decisively is much better than risking 10-minutes. I covered selection procedure in detail in the Last Mile To CAT series that is available on myIMS.
But this does not mean that you need to front load the selection there are different time management strategies that you can apply.
Time Management Strategies
Given that selection becomes so important, the time management strategies should also be revised to maximise your scores in the shorter format.
For QA, the A-B-C approach discussed in the LMTC and in my QA posts, does does not change at all.
For VA-RC and DI-LR, there is more than one approach that you can try out.
All the strategies outlined below assume that you are familiar the Rating Process I discussed in depth in the LMTC Sessions as well the number of questions you need to answer for different percentiles.
VA-RC Time Management Strategy
STRATEGY I – Rating on the go
If you are a slow reader, will take more than 5 minutes to read and rate the passages, and do not want to feel panicked then Rate on the go
You can apply this strategy in three different ways depending on the percentiles you are targeting
Lower percentile targets mean you need to solve fewer RCs, you can afford to leave the worst ones.
STRATEGY IA – Rating on the go — RC-VA-RC
- Start with RATING RCs
- If an RC is rated 7 or above solve it then and there
- If an RC is rated below 7 leave it for the time being
- Solve all VA questions in 10-12 minutes
- Return to the RCs rated below 7 and solve them in decreasing order of rating
This will works for all percentile targets, especially those targeting 80-85 percentiles, since you are not going to get stuck on the bad RCs and can score of VA as well.
STRATEGY IB – Rating on the go — VA First
- Start with VA and solve all questions in under 2 mins per question
- Proceed to RC and rate each RC
- If an RC is rated 7 or above solve it then and there
- If an RC is rated below 7 leave it for the time being
- Return to the RCs rated below 7 and solve them in decreasing order of rating
This works for all percentile targets, especially for those targeting 90-95, since you have a chance to take a shot even at the painful RC. It is easier to execute since you are handling the two areas VA and RC in chunks.
STRATEGY IC – Rating on the go — RC First
- Start with RATING RCs
- If an RC is rated 7 or above solve it then and there
- If an RC is rated below 7 leave it for the time being
- Return to the RCs rated below 7 and solve them in decreasing order of rating
- Solve all VA questions in the end, ensuring that you have around 2 minutes per question
This works best for those who are already scoring above 95 and have a decent reading speed.
STRATEGY II – Rating First
If VA-RC is your strength, you have a pretty good reading speed, you know how to vary it, and are comfortably crossing 99 percentile always, you can do the rating first
You can apply this strategy in three different ways depending on what suits you.
The reason why this works for the 99-plus percentilers is that you are anyway going to solve all questions, this will ensure that you gauge the difficutly of the whole paper in the first five minutes and can plan your section accordingly.
If your find the RCs are all easy or medium, you can go with IIA.
If you find that a few of the RCs are going to be tricky, you can go with IIB
If VA is your strength you can go with IIC
STRATEGY IIA – Rating First — RC First
- Start with RATING RCs
- Rate all the RCs and solve them in decreasing order of rating
- Solve all VA questions in the end
STRATEGY IIB – Rating First — RC-VA-RC
- Start with RATING RCs
- Rate all the RCs and solve only the ones rated 7 and above in decreasing order of rating
- Solve all VA questions
- Return to the RCs rated below 7 and solve them in decreasing order of rating
STRATEGY IIC – Rating First — VA First
- Start with RATING RCs
- Rate all the RCs, assess the level of difficulty, and decide the sequence
- Solve all VA questions
- Solve all RCs in decreasing order of rating
DI-LR Time Management Strategy
Strategy I – Rating on the go
- RATE a set
- Solve it straight away if it is rated 8 or more,
- If not leave it for later
- After you solve all sets 8 rated and above return to solve the remaining sets in descending order of rating
Strategy II — Split Rating
- RATE Sets 1 to 3
- Solve all sets rated 8 or more
- If there are no sets rated 8 or above rate the next 3 sets
- RATE Sets 4 to 6
- Solve all sets rated 8 or more
- SOLVE all remaining sets in descending order of rating
| 90 Percentile | 95 Percentile | 99 Percentile | 99.5 Percentile | 99.95 Percentile | |
| SET SELECTION | 8 mins. | 8 mins. | 6 mins. | 6 mins | 5 mins |
| Easy | 10 mins. | 10 mins. | 7 mins | 6 mins. | 6 mins. |
| Easy | 10 mins. | 10 mins. | 7 mins | 6 mins. | 6 mins. |
| Moderate | 12 mins* | 12 mins | 10 mins. | 10 mins. | 8 mins. |
| Moderate/Tough | 11 mins* | 12 mins | 10 mins. | ||
| Tough | 5 mins* | ||||
| SCORE | 24-30 | 30-36 | 36-40 | 40-44 | 48-52 |
You need to experiment to find out what works best for you
I often find students very scared of changing their test-taking strategies. As if changing their strategies is going throw everything haywire.
I have a different take, unlike cricket where attacking from the get-go is a high-risk strategy since it means you might lose crucial wickets, here you are not taking any extra risk.
Whether you solve VA at the beginning, middle, or end, should have no bearing on how you do on VA since your technique on VA is what will help you answer a question correctly. Again unlike cricket where opening with a spinner with a new ball is different from bowling when the ball is older.
So in order to find the strategy that for you results in maximising your scores you have to experiment with different strategies.
Do not forget, someone once experimented and sent a young SRT to open in New Zealand.
The highest score in SimCAT 10 was 200, so despite everything the topper maximised in the shorter format as well. Do not be surprised towards the end of the season more people start scoring in excess of 180.
Back in the day when VK, Scrabbler and I were preparing the pattern was 4 sections with 50 questions each in 120 minutes. I remember that in one of the mocks I scored 136 (1 mark, -.25) and thought surely this I will top, only for a friend to score 150-plus.
On average, intelligence does not increase or decrease over generations so I am sure after taking some time to adjust, test-takers at the top will push themselves to go for maximum in every section and toppers’ scores in the 120-minute format will start edging closer to the scores in the 180-minute format (If T20 cricket has taught us anything it is this one thing)
Whatever the format the three pillars do not change
- one should always have a strategy to choose questions
- one should have a time-management strategy
- one should be able to solve with good accuracy
Do not forget, you are taking the test, not vice-versa










