So much weight does RC have on the CAT, so many are the difficulties faced by test-takers and so frequent are the queries that I receive about RC, that I thought that it will be best to devote a series of posts to cracking Reading Comprehension.
Passage to questions or Questions to Passage or…
Now the big question has always been whether to read the passage first and then go the questions or read the questions first and then go to the passage.
The problem with reading the entire passage first is that it is a great strategy for those who are exceptionally good and comfortable with reading long texts.
What does being exceptionally good and comfortable mean?
- The ability to read through the whole passage without losing concentration and the thread of the passage
- The ability to answer the primary purpose, the central idea or other summary questions (questions that test your understanding of the passage as a whole) without going back to the passage
- The ability to remember the exact part of the passage to go back to find the answer to a specific question
With most Indian test-takers the first ability itself is suspect. While they might start with the best of intentions, by the time they reach of the middle of the passage they
- start losing interest
- start sneaking a peek at the questions
- somehow manage to reach the end or
- start going back and forth between the questions and the passage
The problem with looking at the questions first is that we are then not doing RC but Match The Following. So that is something that I would rule out straightaway.
Paragraph to questions approach
What I would recommend to most test-takers is a third way that addresses the problems of the first two.
- Read one paragraph, check if there is any question related to it. If there is then solve it immediately — this will increase your accuracy on specific questions since you will have just read the specific part of the passage.
- If there is no question related to it then go-ahead to the next paragraph and repeat the exercise.
- Solve all Summary Questions at the end
- If the paragraphs are short in length, say 4 lines or fewer, you can read two at a time and then go to the questions
While I have been advocating this approach I am still getting queries around both the approach and RC accuracy in general.
The best way to answer this and other queries is to take RCs from a recent CAT and solve them using the paragraph to questions approach.
Passage 1: Creativity & Cities
Creativity is at once our most precious resource and our most inexhaustible one. As anyone who has ever spent any time with children knows, every single human being is born creative; every human being is innately endowed with the ability to combine and recombine data, perceptions, materials and ideas, and devise new ways of thinking and doing. What fosters creativity? More than anything else: the presence of other creative people. The big myth is that creativity is the province of great individual geniuses. In fact, creativity is a social process. Our biggest creative breakthroughs come when people learn from, compete with, and collaborate with other people.
Cities are the true fonts of creativity. With their diverse populations, dense social networks, and public spaces where people can meet spontaneously and serendipitously, they spark and catalyze new ideas. With their infrastructure for finance, organization and trade, they allow those ideas to be swiftly actualized.
As for what staunches creativity, that’s easy, if ironic. It’s the very institutions that we build to manage, exploit and perpetuate the fruits of creativity — our big bureaucracies, and sad to say, too many of our schools. Creativity is disruptive; schools and organizations are regimented, standardized and stultifying.
The education expert Sir Ken Robinson points to a 1968 study reporting on a group of 1,600 children who were tested over time for their ability to think in out-of-the-box ways. When the children were between 3 and 5 years old, 98 percent achieved positive scores. When they were 8 to 10, only 32 percent passed the same test, and only 10 percent at 13 to 15. When 280,000 25-year-olds took the test, just 2 percent passed. By the time we are adults, our creativity has been wrung out of us.
I once asked the great urbanist Jane Jacobs what makes some places more creative than others. She said, essentially, that the question was an easy one. All cities, she said, were filled with creative people; that’s our default state as people. But some cities had more than their shares of leaders, people and institutions that blocked out that creativity. She called them “squelchers.”
Creativity (or the lack of it) follows the same general contours of the great socio-economic divide – our rising inequality – that plagues us. According to my own estimates, roughly a third of us across the United States, and perhaps as much as half of us in our most creative cities – are able to do work which engages our creative faculties to some extent, whether as artists, musicians, writers, techies, innovators, entrepreneurs, doctors, lawyers, journalists or educators – those of us who work with our minds. That leaves a group that I term “the other 66 per cent,” who toil in low-wage rote and rotten jobs — if they have jobs at all — in which their creativity is subjugated, ignored or wasted.
Creativity itself is not in danger. Its flourishing is all around us – in science and technology, arts and culture, in our rapidly revitalizing cities. But we still have a long way to go if we want to build a truly creative society that supports and rewards the creativity of each and every one of us.
Question 1
(A) enable people to meet and share new ideas
(B) expose people to different and novel ideas, because they are home to varied groups of people.
(C) provide the financial and institutional networks that enable ideas to become reality.
(D) provide access to cultural activities that promote new and creative ways of thinking.
Question 2
The author uses ‘ironic’ in the third paragraph to point out that
(A) people need social contact rather than isolation to nurture their creativity
(B) institutions created to promote creativity eventually stifle it
(C) the larger the creative population in a city, the more likely it is to be stifled
(D) large bureaucracies and institutions are the inevitable outcome of successful cities
Question 3
The central idea of this passage is that
(A) social interaction is necessary to nurture creativity
(B) creativity and ideas are gradually declining in all societies
(C) the creativity divide is widening in societies in line with socio-economic trends
(D) more people should work in jobs that engage their creative faculties
Question 4
Jane Jacobs believed that cities that are more creative
(A) have to struggle to retain their creativity
(B) have to ‘squelch’ unproductive people and promote creative ones
(C) have leaders and institutions that do not block creativity
(D) typically do not start off as creative hubs
Question 5
The 1968 study is used here to show that
(A) as they get older, children usually learn to be more creative
(B) schooling today does not encourage creative thinking in children
(C) the more children learn, the less creative they become
(D) technology today prevents children from being creative
Question 6
The author’s conclusions about the most ‘creative cities’ in the US (paragraph 6) are based on his assumption that
(A) people who work with their hands are not doing creative work
(B) more than half the population works in non-creative jobs
(C) only artists, musicians, writers, and so on should be valued in a society
(D) most cities ignore or waste the creativity of low-wage workers
Paragraph 1
A quick scan through the questions shows that there is no question based on the first paragraph. So you can move to the second one without answering any question.
Do not try to remember questions, if you do so then you will again be doing method 2 — match the following instead of RC.
Paragraph 2
The first question is a specific question based on paragraph 2.
It is an EXCEPT question that is asking you to identify the reason that is NOT stated to make the claim that cities promote creativity.
This has to be the easiest RC question of all time — A, B and C are clearly stated in the passage, D is not mentioned anywhere.
In effect, you have 3 marks in the bag in under 4 minutes.
Paragraph 3
As you start reading the first sentence of the third paragraph itself you should know that there will be a question on this; the first sentence itself says — it’s ironic. It goes without saying that they will test your understanding of what ironic means. The paragraph itself explains it. You go to the questions to find the next question based on it and pocket 3 more marks.
It is again pretty direct and you should have no trouble confirming option B as the right option.
By now you should have 6 marks in 6 minutes.
If you find this question tough then I am afraid there is a fundamental comprehension problem that no amount of strategies or shortcuts can solve. It might sound harsh but you might have to really take another shot at the CAT and spend a lot of time improving your ability in reading and comprehending text written in English.
If you have taken 10 minutes to score these 6 marks from three paragraphs then reading speed is a major issue. The only way out is to practice RCs alone non-stop for a week so that you put so much stress on your reading muscle that it has to grow.
Paragraph 4
After reading this paragraph, you should again scan the questions and you will find that question 5 is related to it.
This is where you will first encounter a mild case of — I am caught between two options.
Options B and C might seem to be vying for your vote.
So how do you break this deadlock?
In the words of my colleague Sujit Sir, who is the author of a famous RC Book, and is the one who makes most of the SimCAT RC questions, the first step is to identify the superficial difference between the options.
When caught between two options,
- Phrase the difference between the two options
- See which one is relevant to the question and eliminate if possible
- If not go the specific part of the passage
- If you are still unable to break the deadlock, go the previous paragraph
Option B — Schooling smothers creativity
Option C — Learning smothers creativity
Even without going back to the paragraph you can see that C has to be wrong! Between learning and schooling, the latter is definitely the culprit.
If you go the paragraph it will be clear the Ken Robinson is an education expert and he is referring to schools.
If it is still not clear then go to the previous paragraph, the last sentence screams the answer out loud.
By the way, I watched the Ken Robinson videos a long time back — this and this are definitely worth a watch.
9 marks in 8 minutes.
Paragraph 5
There is a question on this as well — question 4 — and as mildly indirect as a question can get. The answer is Option C.
If you are keeping count 12 marks in 10 minutes.
Paragraph 6
The last question is based on this. It is an assumption question that is pretty direct
The author says — in most of our cities 1/3, and in some 1/2, of our people work in creative jobs or jobs of the mind, while the other 2/3 have no jobs or do rotten jobs.
The assumption is captured by only by option A. 15 marks in 13 minutes.
At the end of the exercise, you are left with one unanswered summary question.
This is one of those typical CAT RC questions on which the options frustrate me since I do find any of them to be precisely correct. So the best option on CAT RC questions — reject don’t select. Your heart won’t leap and dance when you see the correct option, you have to reject and be happy with whatever is left.
Question 3
The central idea of this passage is that
A) social interaction is necessary to nurture creativity
B) creativity and ideas are gradually declining in all societies
C) the creativity divide is widening in societies in line with socio-economic trends
D) more people should work in jobs that engage their creative faculties
If we go by rejection then
- A can be kept
- B can be rejected since the last paragraph categorically says that creativity is flourishing
- C can be rejected since the passage only says that creative divide follows the socio-economic divide it does not say that the divide has increased
- D can be kept
Now we again boil down to two options and this is a summary question.
You can defend and not score instead of getting out
Should you always mark an answer for every RC question you encounter after you read a passage?
The summary question above is a poorly made one since neither option exactly captures the central idea.
Now if I look at my time spent so far, I have 15 marks in about 13 minutes, which is great from an MPM or Marks Per Minute perspective.
So do I need to break my head and waste my time over this silly question?
Nope, I will be better off moving on without collecting a negative.
Test-takers refuse to consider letting a question go an option. If they have spent so much time reading they think they might as well mark.
The odds of getting it right when stuck between two options are still 50 percent provided you haven’t eliminated the correct option!
So do yourself a favor — defend and not score instead of getting out.
Just to close things on this passage, between A and D I would choose A since it covers a larger portion of the passage and the author is not directly making a claim that more people should be doing creative jobs. The author only says that more people can be in creative jobs.
In the first version of this post, I only wrote this much about the last question of this passage.
But then I started a receiving a few queries that made it clear to me that for many test-takers weak VA scores have a basic problem with a few fundamentals.
They do not clearly look at what the question is asking but only look at the content that question refers to.
What do I mean by this?
The last question is an assumption question.
What is an assumption?
Something which is not stated but is central to drawing a conclusion.
Unlike the real world in which anything that is stated but not proven is not an assumption, on aptitude tests, it is an incorrect premise.
Which is why an assumption is also called the missing premise.
Premise 1 + Missing Premise (Assumption) = Conclusion
The paragraph is asking you to identify the behind the conclusion drawn in paragraph 6.
So before you go to the options go back and paraphrase the conclusion — Creativity divide mirrors the socio-economic divide.
Premises 1 — Cities that are more creative have 1/2 of the population doing work of the mind. Cities that are less creative have 1/3 doing work of the mind.
Premise 2 — The rest of the population is doing rotten jobs or is unemployed.
The conclusion has the term — creativity. The two premises have the terms work of the mind and rotten work.
So the missing premise has to connect creativity and work of the mind or rotten work. Only the first option does that.
So as a process when it comes to assumption questions please follow this process. Otherwise, you will always end up caught between the option that is relevant to the content but is not the answer and the actual assumption.
The reason I favour this approach is that as a question-setter (I have made a few RCs for this year’s SimCATs as well) I know that to make 6 questions I have to mine each and every paragraph for questions.
You can maybe have a 3-question passage with no question from a particular passage. But a 6-question passage will have 3 questions from three separate paragraphs.
I know that one passage isn’t enough to prove my point. So I will take up all the passages from the slot that this passage appeared in and analyze them through this lens. Hope by the end of this series of posts your RC woes will have reduced considerably.
The CAT Writer 
sir i did apply this strategy in some of the rcs i practicesd and it kind of worked, i mean i was able to solve those rcs which was supposed to be hard in language, although questions were quite easy in some of them. but if i was not using this strategy then perhaps i wouldnt able to recognise the questions pattern itself, still i consider myself very weak in varc section, i must be honest here as cat is approaching too, in this post the Rc you solved i couldnt able to perform good, only one question correct, first question i did a silly mistake and got little careless and didnt really check if that para got any question related, in the 5th question i was confused between b and c, marked with an inference that was out of the passage, but during that time you really dont think that way. only 2questions were there which i did not understand well including summary one, in other 4 questions i could have contemplated more. i am expecting a reply sir, i really need to improve on my VARC section, any method you would suggest, any harsh reality you’d wanna show to me(does not matter how bluntly it’d appear), i think i needed that- the only scope of improvement. thank you sir.
LikeLike
Hi Prateek,
From your description of how you solved the RC, you can see for yourself that there is no process that you are following end to end. You have just looked at one side of the technique, involving reading the passage but not the other side, the technique to solve the question.
You cannot possibly tell me — in the 5th question i was confused between b and c, marked with an inference that was out of the passage, but during that time you really dont think that way. Well, if you cant think that way in the exam and will mark anything — without checking back with the passage, or with the shadow answer you have framed for yourself, or without asking whether this inference is supported by the passage then you are not solving RC.
You just want some marks in VA-RC without demonstrating any of the skills required for VARC. When cricket players play away from the body or get out unnecessarily they do not come back and say — but during that time you really dont think that way — and we give them all sorts of gaalis and make memes!
There is only one thing for VARC, how clean and consistent is your application of technique every single time. I will be posting more posts, including one for VA as well. The video solutions of the SimCATs also follow the same technique.
Hope this helps,
All the best!
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes sir indeed, i accept my mistake. I will practice this technique for sure, and I hope I get better soon. It was just I was so scared to know “am i that weak in this particular section?” well, even if i am, i gotta put the hardwork . All i wanna ask now, my last question what should be my approach for varc as 100 days left, I wanna put hard work, but not like a donkey, this is my biggest fear when you are putting hard work and in the end you realise oh it was all in wrong direction. so daily solving Rcs based on this technique, figuring out did i really apply it well? is all i should be doing for the rest of the days(for Rcs)?
Also thankyou sir for your blog, it really motivates us. means alot.
LikeLike
Hi Ravi,
We practice to reach a particular level of performance. You need to practice 3-4 RCs, back to back until you consistently hit 75% accuracy in the desired time.
Not just in VA or RC but even in QA areas, the same rule applies.
After one masters all areas, one just takes Mocks and analyses them (that too one mock every alternate day).
One big thing to keep in mind is that one cannot prepare for CAT for a whole day for more than a 1-2 months! Beyond that it takes just 2 hours of prep every day.
Hope this helps,
All the best!
LikeLike
Hello Sir,
I am confused with HR and MM as Specalization. For forms of XAT and NMIMS, I need to enter the preference for specalization. I wanted to know what should be my 1st preference BM or HR as per you.
Also, wanted to clarify if I choose XLRI BM or NMIMS Mba core program Will the first year for both the course will be general? And in the second year, Will I be able to select HR as a specalization because both these clg has separate HR programs?
Also how different will the placement and course, be for a specialization Hr program and going for HR from a core MBA? Will I have fewer opportunities in HR coming from the Core/general/BM MBA program as compared to those candidates who have enrolled in XLRI HR or NMIMS HR program?
Also, do the people who enrolled in the HR program from the beginning can sit for other field placement interviews?
Please provide some clarity. It will be a great help
LikeLike
Hi Harshal,
Please go through this post. It covers all aspects for you to be able to take a call.
All the best!
LikeLike
Pingback: How to increase your accuracy on RC – 2 | The CAT Writer
Pingback: How to increase your accuracy on RC – 3 | The CAT Writer
Hello,
I (have attended simCAT sessions and LMTC; and) have understood how we can categorise RCs based on their language, content and topic, but sometimes passages are very deceptive. The first paragraph seems fine — but as I go on the complexity of ideas keeps getting trickier.
Earlier, I used to write the conclusion of every para on a small notepad, but this technique proved to be very time-consuming, so I am trying to do this exercise mentally now. My understanding of passages is getting better, but QUESTIONS ARE A REAL PAIN! For example in simCAT 11, the language of all the RCs was moderate, but the questions of some of them were quite difficult and I ended up picking the most challenging RCs.
How to follow ABC approach in RCs based on the kind of questions?
Similar problem in para-summary questions — I cannot decide whether I should attempt it or not until I go through it entirely. Para-jumble and para-completion are still manageable.
LikeLike
Hi Amulya,
Questions as discussed in LMTC are all worded with 1,2,3 level reasoning and most of these questions are standard formats that can be pasted below any passage: Which of the following, if FALSE, will be in accordance with the passage, EXCEPT.
While this might seem like a tough question the only way to solve it is by interpreting the question right: if FALSE the in accordance means, if true, then not in accordance; EXCEPT means, in accordance — Which of the following is true as per the passage?
So, if you feel that you are not able to do this interpretation then check how many questions in a passage have such tricky reasoning and leave the passage.
But you do realise that your choice is clear:
1. Choose Tough text — unlikely to understand it properly, 1-2 level reasoning questions
2. Choose readable text — attempt 1-2 level questions and if possible 3-level by working on interpreting skills.
There will always be exceptions. The odd cases where the first para seems easy but ideas get tricky but one cannot fixate too much on that.
Summary questions, there is no way of choosing. You have to decide not to attempt after you have spent 2 minutes.
Hope this helps,
All the best1
LikeLike
Yes sir, this helps! Thanks a lot for responding.
However, by “questions are a real pain” in RCs, I meant that I am able to interpret the question stem — as you said level 1,2,3 reasoning. The problem is option elimination. The text was readable and the questions were understandable, but the options were quite perplexing.
Do you think I should follow the shadow answer technique maybe? Or should there have been some portion of the RC I didn’t understand the way I should’ve?
Because even after the mock ended — that question seemed confusing only, so it wasn’t the pressure of time.
LikeLike
Hello sir, I am not able to understand exactly how can i solve my problem of anxiety during varc section and because of this things my score continuously reduced from 95% to around 50% in 3-4 mocks. When i had taken 1st mock, i was quite relaxed during test because as am not done with whole syllabus so can completely accept low score. But , as of now with completed portion. I went through the time management strategies videos for each que and now find myself stuck. i continuously look toward the timer and felt anxious and got fear abt what if i m not done with fixed no. of ques and all. Because of this continuous thoughts in my mind i cant focus on reading and cant understand things well. This all create more panickness. please sir, Help me to get out of this situation. One more thing, is that okay to skip parajumbles all time, without even reading the que and wasting time as i never get that ques right.
LikeLike
Hi Sneha,
You know your job is to attempt two passages in 25 mins, solve 6-8 questions and get 4-5 questions right.
In the rest of the 15 minutes, you need to get 4-5 VA questions right, with or without Parajumbles as long as you get 4-5 questions right.
Now what is important is that you practice questions with these time limits in practice: 2 passages with a 25 minute timer and 8 VA questions with a 15-min timer (need not be mixed, it can be all Summary or Parajumbles).
Once you get comfortable with this, you can execute this in the test.
It goes without saying that the technique of solving must be aligned to the process we have outlined in all of our video solutions.
Hope this helps,
All the best!
LikeLike